Henry County Enterprise
  • News
    • Business
    • Community Calendar
    • State News
    • National News
  • Obituaries
  • eEnterprise
  • Classifieds
  • Spiritual
    • The Episcopal Diocese of Virginia
    • Transcendental Meditation
    • Parabola
    • Southern Baptist
  • Classifieds
  • Contact
  • Login
Subscribe For $2.50/Month
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Business
    • Community Calendar
    • State News
    • National News
  • Obituaries
  • eEnterprise
  • Classifieds
  • Spiritual
    • The Episcopal Diocese of Virginia
    • Transcendental Meditation
    • Parabola
    • Southern Baptist
  • Classifieds
  • Contact
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
Henry County Enterprise
No Result
View All Result
Home Local News

Candidates find common ground on reversion during debate

October 28, 2021
in Local News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Email
Joe Bryant (left) and Andrew Palmer, candidates for the Collinsville District seat on the Henry County Board of Supervisors, went head-to-head in a recent debate. Bryant, the incumbent, is running for his fourth term in office.

By Callie Hietala

Joe Bryant and Andrew Palmer may have different views about management of the county, but the two candidates for the Collinsville District supervisor seat are firmly united in how they view reversion. 

The two squared off in a debate held at Hollywood Cinemas, filmed on a closed set by Star News and hosted by Bill Wyatt. At Wyatt’s urging, the candidates opened the hour-and-a-half-long debate by paying their opponent a compliment. Palmer congratulated Bryant on his business acumen as owner and president of Bryant Radio Supply, while Bryant told Palmer he admired his stamina during the campaign and his desire to work to better the community. 

The men came together, too, when discussion turned to the issue of reversion, which both said they are firmly against. 

“I have never been for reversion,” Bryant said. When asked if he would vote to approve the Voluntary Settlement Agreement (VSA) which has been reviewed by the Commission on Local Government (CLG), which both city and county both need to do to move reversion forward, he said he would not. “I was against it then, I’m against it now, and I will always be against it.” 

Palmer said it was his understanding that if the three-judge panel rules in favor of reversion, only the city council can stop the process. 

“If I’m elected and if the three-judge panel hasn’t ruled on it yet, I’m going to do everything I can to worry all five members of Martinsville City Council every day to get them to stop the process because they’re the ones that have the power. Communication is key to stop this,” Palmer said.

The next steps in the process require both city and county to hold one more public hearing on reversion and then adopt the Voluntary Settlement Agreement (VSA) by ordinance. 

Bryant said that, at this point “the city council members are the only five people that can stop this,” adding that the supervisors needed to use their influence to encourage council members to do so.

Palmer said that, as he understood the issue, if a third supervisor were to join Bryant and Debra Buchanan, of the Horsepasture District, in voting against adoption of the agreement, it could delay the process, possibly even until Martinsville holds elections next year, presenting an opportunity for anti-reversion candidates for city council to be elected and put a stop to the process. 

Bryant said, “100 percent.”

“We’re on the same page,” said Palmer.

Other debate topics ranged from annexation (which both men agreed would be bad for the county but speculated was a main reason for reversion) to their visions for the fate of Martinsville’s schools after reversion to Henry County Sheriff Lane Perry’s recent request for raises and bonuses to help retain law enforcement officers. 

Both candidates expressed their support for first responders and law enforcement, though Palmer took issue with the way the supervisors responded to Perry’s request the day it was made. He said a more positive response was needed to indicate to Perry and his deputies, many of whom were in the meeting room, that they were supported by the supervisors. 

Palmer said he would have used some of the county’s surplus funds to pay one-time bonuses to officers as a show of good faith, then begin working on finding funding for long-term raises. Bryant argued that he received word of Perry’s request a week before the supervisor’s meeting while he was busy with the ongoing Henry County Fair, and he did not have sufficient time to review or discuss it with the other supervisors before the meeting. 

 

 

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Email
ShareTweetPin
Previous Post

Community Calendar

Next Post

Cari Lord Zimmer

Next Post
Cari Lord Zimmer

Cari Lord Zimmer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join Our Newsletter

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Business
    • Community Calendar
    • State News
    • National News
  • Obituaries
  • eEnterprise
  • Classifieds
  • Spiritual
    • The Episcopal Diocese of Virginia
    • Transcendental Meditation
    • Parabola
    • Southern Baptist
  • Classifieds
  • Contact
  • Login

© 2020 Mountain Media, LLC

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Email

Forgot your password?

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive mail with link to set new password.

Back to login

Add Henry County Enterprise to your Homescreen!

Add